We went to the art museum to see an exhibit of Roman art that was in our fair city on loan from the Louvre.
En route, I had the kids take turns reading short chapters about ancient Rome from a kids’ history book. I wanted them to have some historical context for the sculptures, busts, and reliefs they were about to view, so they took turns reading about Romulus & Remus, Julius, Augustus, and Nero.
Then we arrived at the museum. As we walked toward the building, I reminded the children to speak softly and just look, don’t touch. We started practicing softer voices, then walked along the sidewalk silently for a few steps.
As we neared the door, my son asked, “Can we breathe through our mouths in the museum?”
“Yes. You can breathe through your nose or your mouth.”
“Oh, good!” he exclaimed.
“But don’t breathe heavily on the statues,” I warned. “And resist the urge to touch.”
They laughed about it as we headed into the show.
I’ve never studied art history, though I’ve read books like The Annotated Mona Lisa: A Crash Course in Art History from Prehistoric to Post-Modern and Sister Wendy’s Story of Painting. I’m self-taught at a surface level, so here’s why I like about looking at art with kids:
I’m Forced to Slow Down and Really See the Art
First, in order to get them to really look at something, I have to really look at it. I scan the information posted nearby—date, artist, name of the piece or subject matter, etc—then I look at the piece of art.
I try to take note of some detail that will entice the kids to stop and look, as well. I try to capture their interest for a moment or two, because, you know, you can’t blame them for assuming at first glance that it all looks the same. The first couple of rooms could just appear to be a bunch of nondescript, chipped up, old marble statues. I suppose that’s what they are.
Until you look.
Until you consider the context. The age. The history. The amazing talent of sculptors from a couple hundred years BC to a few hundred years AD.
Boy, was I glad we’d read aloud the stories about Julius and Augustus on our way, because we stopped and read the placards to discover that there was a big statue of Augustus and his wife, Livia. And then there was Tiberius and Caligula and Nero. We could talk about Jesus’ birth in the time of Pax Romana. A mom behind us pointed to the statue of Tiberius and said to her son, “When Jesus was crucified on the cross, this man was in power.”
We looked at ancient Roman jewelry, and my son, enthralled by the gold, pulled out a pencil and his tiny notebook and sketched some of the diadems and necklaces. We stood next to him as he stared and sketched, following the lines and curves with his eye and reproducing them as closely as possible on the humble lined paper of his tiny, spiral-bound notebook.
I Can Say Almost Anything about the Art
Then came other observations and comments that make me very happy to be with children in an art exhibit—you can note or say anything and people generally grin and nod, appreciating the attempt to introduce kids to art.
Nobody seems to judge my ignorance.
Nobody’s expecting erudite comments.
We’re just looking and responding to it.
What’s more, this day the place was packed with students on field trips, so everybody was relaxed and enjoying themselves.
This is what my kids and I noticed:
Nero looked practically angelic as a young boy. As we stood in front of his statue, I remarked, “He looks so innocent.”
The Boy loudly responded, “Yes, but he was baaad news.”
This lady and the one next to her had an intricate mass of curls encircling their faces. “Those curls look like Cheerios,” I said, “or Froot Loops.”
“They do!” the kids laughed. “They really do!”
We came upon a room with some, um, toga-less statues, shall we say. One of the girls said, “Ugh. This room is unappealing.”
I didn’t know what she meant until I caught a glimpse of the statues along the side wall. “Oh! I see what you mean. They seem to have forgotten their togas.”
“I find it…unappealing,” she repeated.
“Well, it’s just how they made a lot of old art,” I said. “We’ll take a quick look and move along.”
Kids Notice Things I’d Pass By
As we came to the first one, a smug-looking Paris, my son realized there was a problem. “Look, he’s missing some of his… (pause; then, in a stage whisper) private parts.” Indeed, he was. You’d never know it by his demeanor.
We got to see this lady’s head, which was enormous. To give some perspective, here’s a shot of some people installing her. Everything else seemed small by comparison.
Several mosaics pieced together from tiny squares and chips—tesserae. Their colors were subtle. How could the artist know how to place those things in such a way that they could form people and animals? How could it stay in such great shape for so long? Two of them were floors.
We saw a boxy urn for ashes. I explained to the kids what it was used for. Their response? “Gross.”
One relief showed a person holding a bull by its nostrils and stabbing it with a sword. “Look at the blood trickling down,” I said.
“Gross,” the kids said.
A couple of statues of some god with extra-thick hair and beard who is associated with regeneration made us laugh. He was missing a limb and a nose. I wonder how many other people made the same connection. “Looks like he needs to regenerate his own nose,” I observed.
One of the girls pointed out another small sculpture of the same guy. “Hey, here he needs to regenerate a leg!”
“He sure seems to be generating a big head of hair.”
I thought the most intricate and beautiful of all the art in the exhibit was this girl. Unfortunately, you can’t see the detail in her hair or the folds of her lower skirt undulating at her feet. How do sculptors do that? How could they carve such intricate detail into a hunk of marble? How do they give the impression of movement?
How do they look at a hunk of marble and know just what to chip away to create such realistic lines? How can they tap away at such a hard, cold, unforgiving material and leave behind what seems to be soft folds of fabric, draped luxuriously over somebody’s arm?
And how can it all stay in such great condition for so many years?
Sure, a few have lost a thumb, foot, finger, nose, or top of an ear…and as we noted, more than one piece lost its private parts…but so many of them were intact, every Froot Loop in place. I suppose that art historians and conservationists are paid diddly squat for their work, not to mention the archaeologists who unearth and clean up the treasures in the first place. But they deserve our thanks.
Thanks to their diligence, thousands of years after those busts and statues were formed, four young kids could meet up with history, and a mom could enjoy a chance to see art with kids.
* * *
You might also enjoy:
Is every hour rush hour at your house?
Explore the jarring effects of our overcommitted culture and find refreshing alternatives for a more meaningful family and spiritual life.
Find a pace that frees your family to flourish.
“Not So Fast is a gift to every reader who takes the time to slow down and breathe in its pages.”
—Lee Strobel, best-selling author of The Case for Christ
One of the things I’ve noticed in Italy is how casually they live with their ancient art. Sure, the really good stuff is in their museums, churches, etc. But I’ve seen what we would consider art treasures decorating a car dealership. And the approach to a villa near Venice was a line of carved statues, but now they look like a line of fence posts–and it was a field of some kind behind them. One of our travelers even remarked, “Look at those classy fence posts!” As you know, my favorite piece of all art is the statue of David…it is just hard to believe there isn’t life inside that marble!
That is too funny. I love the simplistic yet interested approach of kids. The statue you linked to was very… cool. 🙂
Great experience for both you and your kids! I love museums, but my hubby hates them. He likes to touch things and speak loud, so its not very comfortable for him. I need to give him your museum behavior lesson! 🙂 But, my favorite was your son taking out his notebook and sketching…what a great inspiration for him to have available to him! Hopefully, he will be someone more comfortable in museums than my hubby when he grows up.
Lynn (Mom): I agree. It seems like a lot of American museums keep visitors way, way back from the pieces forcing us to view from a distance. In Europe, shoot, I could practically get nose-to-nose with an enormous da Vinci painting that was in the grand hallway of the Louvre.
Anna: Thanks for commenting. Maybe I *think* people are nodding and grinning at my being the mom exposing her kids to art, when really they’re just grinning to hold back the laughter at the crazy woman?
Sue: Thanks for your note, Sue. It was really loud in that show, so maybe you need to have him take a day off work and go on a big field trip day for schools! And then my boy’s diligence at trying to draw that jewelry was so neat. The girls used to do that, too. I should have encouraged all of them to bring along a notebook and pencil, but they might have felt more shy than he to pull it out in front of the high school students that were milling around.
I had the same experience while living in Italy; art was everywhere and I kept stopping to snap pictures of objects that my (Italian) friends never seemes to notice because the stuff is so common to them. But for one like me, who has always had to look at such works from behind velvet ropes and bulletproof glass, the experience was incredible!
In any event, you are a great mother for taking your children on such an excursion! One author noted that youth exposed to great works of art tend to snub their noses at fads and pop culture; your children will have YOU to thank for their heightened sense of taste!
P.S. I also worked at an archive in Italy where I routinely picked through valuable historical documents from the middle ages. At American archives, however, alarms go off if you try to step too close to a 1920’s movie poster!