Five Writing Strengths

In light of Charity’s recent post about becoming masterful, I looked back on a list of Five Writing Strengths I wrote four years ago, to see if I would change or add anything—to see if I can still draw from these strengths to be the best Ann I can be as a writer.

I like to think I have more than five, but this is a good start.

The Meme Instructions:

So, here’s the challenge: make a list of five strengths that you possess as a writer/artist. It’s not really bragging, it’s an honest assessment (forced upon you by this darn meme). Please resist the urge to enumerate your weaknesses, or even mention them in contrast to each strong point you list. Tag four other writers or artists whom you’d like to see share their strengths. [Read more...]

Clearly and Boldly

Oswald Chambers spoke to me today.

Not audibly. That would be freaky.

No, Mr. Chambers spoke via the words he was faithful to record many years ago, preserved in My Utmost for His Highest, though even phrasing it that way seems a bit much. Maybe we could just say that I was inspired.

In any case, please join me in pondering his advice. I’ve included it in its entirety here: [Read more...]

Rescue the Stories

An actual dream I had while in Texas:

As I stood next to a pool, a little girl who couldn’t swim jumped in and sank to the bottom. She didn’t struggle at all. In fact, she was intent on rescuing a piece of paper or two, lifting them up over her head, trying to bring them to the surface.

She couldn’t make it back up on her own. [Read more...]

What’s Next?

Just as our nonfiction workshop was finishing up at the Laity Lodge writers retreat, Lauren Winner said to the group, “I don’t know what you’re planning to do with your afternoon break, but I would suggest that you take advantage of the time and write.”

Had she seen the canyon? The river?

Have you? [Read more...]

“What is X doing for this piece?”

Because I signed up for the nonfiction track of the Laity Lodge writers retreat, I was required to submit in advance ten pages of “spiritual nonfiction.”

The workshop format meant that each person would receive a copy of every other participant’s ten-page submission to evaluate and critique.

I can’t reveal details of our sessions, because in order to build trust and encourage honesty within our group, Lauren Winner forbid us to talk or write—especially to blog—about what happened during workshop. [Read more...]

What's Your Story?

notebook

The One-Year Bible reading for November 14 included the passage from Hebrews telling us to “fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2)

What an image! Jesus as an author, composing, editing—perfecting—our faith!

I already had that passage floating around in my head when I sat down to watch the Steven Spielberg film “Amistad.”

In one scene, John Quincy Adams (played by Anthony Hopkins) talks with a fictional character named Mr. Jodson (played by Morgan Freeman) about who the Africans on the “Amistad” really are.

Someone published the dialogue from that scene in an essay both here and here, so I pulled from that source to post it. The interaction originated from the film:

Adams: In the courtroom, whoever tells the best story, wins. What is their story, by the way?

Jodson: Sir?

Adams: What is their story?

Jodson:  They’re from West Africa.

Adams: No, what is their story?

(Jodson remains silent, looking puzzled.)

Adams: Mr. Jodson, where are you from originally?

Jodson: Georgia.

Adams: Is that who you are, a Georgian? Is that your story? No, you’re an ex-slave who’s devoted his life to the abolition of slavery and overcome great obstacles and hardships along the way, I should imagine. That’s your story, isn’t it?

(Jodson nods, slowly, with a slight smile.)

Adams: You have proven you know what they are. They’re Africans. Congratulations. What you don’t know—and as far as I can tell haven’t bothered in the least to discover—is who they are. (Cunningham 1151)

I can fairly easily answer the question What am I?

I’m a wife, mom, Hoosier, writer.

But the more compelling question is Who am I … What’s my story?

As that scene in the film unfolded, I asked myself that compelling question, combining it with that passage from Hebrews:

With Jesus as Author, what’s my story?

It’s a good question to ask while reflecting in journal-mode. It’s important to ask when pondering what’s next in life.

What’s the next line of my story? The next page?  The next chapter? The next blog entry?

And how does it all fit?

As we try to discover the story that’s been written thus far, we have an opportunity to find themes in the unfolding of the years and purpose in the unfolding of our days.

When we get an idea of our story, we can understand better who we are—and who we want to be—and hopefully we’ll see what the Author has in mind.

Because for those of us who have given our lives to Jesus, our story … is His story.

Works Cited

Amistad. Dir. Steven Spielberg. Perf. Morgan Freeman, Nigel Hawthorne, Anthony Hopkins, Djimon Hounsou, Matthew McConaughey, David Paymer, Pete Postlethwaite, and Stellan Skarsgard. DreamWorks, 1997. DVD.
Cunningham, Clark D.  “But What Is Their Story?” Emory Law Journal. Vol . 52 Special Edition (2003): 1151. Web. 15 Nov. 2009. <http://law.gsu.edu/Communication/Emory.pdf>.
Image by: Ivan Prole.Notebook with spiral and red cover.” 2009. stock.xchng. Web. 15 Nov. 2009.

It’s easy to subscribe to annkroeker.com updates via email or RSS feed.

Visit NotSoFastBook.com to learn more about Ann’s new book.

Guest Appearance

On a recent post, I listed ideas for posting when ideas aren’t coming. One of those ideas was to invite someone to guest blog, which I said I’d never done. I meant that I’d never invited anybody to guest blog over here at Ann Kroeker, but I haven’t ever guest blogged for anybody else, either.

And then you can guess what happened: Two people asked me if I would make an appearance!

One was a relatively new gal in Blogdom, Nicole at tickledpinkbynicole. I think she said she’s only been blogging since November, but what an impressive launch! She seems to have this thing down to a science.

Anyway, she sent me a list of questions, and I answered them.

Curious about the questions? And the answers? Hop on over and check it out

(my headshot is really big, so don’t say I didn’t warn you. I flinched upon arrival).

Backwards WFMW: Blog-Definition

On the backwards edition of Works For Me Wednesday, I get to ask questions instead of offer tips. 

This blog first came about because of the book I’d written. My publisher suggested I start a blog back when most people I knew had never heard of blogs or blogging. I had to explain it to them, and they thought it was strange–some people suggested it was a colossal waste of time, but I loved it and tapped away, regularly publishing post after post.

Over time, the blog morphed into a more personal blog, as I shared family stories and connected with other moms on the blogosphere.

As a result of this gradual unfolding of style and content, this blog simply goes by Ann Kroeker, instead of a bloggish name that hints at its purpose and content. In fact, for now it serves as an online presence for my writing life.

So I’ve been thinking about refining the blog and its content, but hesitant, since many people have mentioned that they appreciate the wide range of topics that pop up here. 

It’ll be great to hear from both readers and bloggers, and those who attended BlogHer would have interesting insights:

Readers, what do you enjoy most in a blog (specifically this blog)?

  1. Humorous personal/family stories
  2. Helpful ideas (like WFMW tips)
  3. Thoughtful insights on topics relatng to motherhood/writing/life/Christianity (one of more of those topics)
  4. Devotional-style posts
  5. Posts pertaining to the writing life
  6. A mixture of posts, unexpectedly tuning into any of the above (if you like a mixture, would it be helpful to categorize them more clearly? Or should a blogger keep separate blogs for different topics)
  7. Other

Bloggers, have you narrowed down your blog’s purpose and seen good results from doing so? If so, how did you go about the process of defining that purpose?

BlogHer attendees, what were the top two changes you made in your blog or the act of blogging as a result of the insights you gained from the conferences?

Everyone: Assuming you weren’t already stopping by regularly, would you be more drawn to this blog if it had a bloggy-style name?

Visit Rocks In My Dryer for more questions on this backwards Works For Me Wednesday.

See my previously published, odd assortment of tips and solutions here.

Adventures in Literary Outings: Outlandish Poetry

When I stepped into the first breakout session at the writers’ colloquium last weekend, I felt a familiar sensation. Let’s call it the “stomach-gasp.” It wasn’t audible, but visceral, occurring somewhere in the gut, near the pit of my stomach.

As if sucked back in time to Ballantine Hall on the campus of Indiana University, I realized I was back in a creative writing workshop. I was about to experience a poetry workshop identical in format to the classes I signed up for decades earlier to earn my B.A. in English. Those classes weren’t easy for me emotionally. I always felt intimidated.

The leader of this breakout session, Maurice Manning, teaches poetry at Indiana University. That’s why I knew that the biggest difference between this and my classes would be that I was not in Ballantine Hall. What was the same–what traversed time and space–were all of the insecurities that plagued me then and apparently still plague me today.

Manning passed out a packet of poetry, titling the discussion “Writing and Religious Inquiry.” The poems to consider included John Donne’s Holy Sonnet 14, George Herbert’s Sin, Emily Dickinson’s Poem 314, Gerard Manley Hopkins’ God’s Grandeur, James Wright’s A Blessing, Alan Dugan’s Prayer, Yusef Komunyakaa’s Thanks, and Mary Oliver’s The Summer Day.

I actually referenced The Summer Day in a recent post here on the blog, so when I flipped through and spotted it in his packet, I felt particularly literary-minded–for a few seconds. My pleasure was short-lived, because it turned out that I had nothing to offer the conversation. I intellectually seized up during the class. Brain-freeze, without the Dairy Queen Mr. Misty.

He would read a poem and ask us to respond. Several people contributed their ideas and reactions. I sat, as I did years ago, staring at the text. It takes me a while to evaluate and arrive at any kind of analysis. I’m slow of mind, I suppose. I didn’t say one word.

After spending time having us consider each poem, Manning turned to the Questions and Exercises he designed around these poems. We had little time left before lunch, so he chose one assignment. Some of the poems contained bold statements, prayers, and scenarios that might be considered by some to be downright outrageous. So Manning said this:

“What is the most outlandish thing you could say to God? Write a poem based on the most outlandish thing you could say to God, that starts with the phrase ‘….and another thing.’”

People chuckled, squirmed, considered the assignment with various head tilts and pencil tapping, and then started scribbling.

I, on the other hand, stared at my sheet of paper.

I doodled.

I stared some more.

After the familiar sinking feeling eased up a bit, I did start thinking about it. It was to be a prayer. What would be outlandish to God? What would be outlandish for me to say to Him? Before I could get going on an interesting phrase or two, my mind tripped up and tangled itself in a string of unnecessary thoughts. I should have just written from the moment. I just couldn’t seem to produce on the spot, though clearly everybody else could.

I doodled some more. I slowly wrote “…..and another thing!” but nothing followed.

Instead of just going with the intent of the assignment, instead of scratching out something with energy and passion, I starting thinking that nothing is outlandish to an all-knowing God. There’s nothing I can say to Him that would be outlandish…to Him.

Instead, I started thinking about the fact that the very act of prayer seems outlandish not to God, but to those who don’t believe in a God at all. No prayer is outlandish to God. It’s only outlandish from the human perspective–to one who doesn’t believe at all, prayer is an outlandish act. To most of the world, I would seem a fool or clown for opening my mind, mouth, and my very soul to a God who can’t be seen or heard. I suppose God Himself is the outlandish One to those who don’t believe. Jesus is particularly outlandish; the message of the cross is foolishness to the world.

And in that jumble of ideas and words, all specificity which makes for a powerful poem was lost.

Time was up, and Manning invited us to go around the room and share what we had written. Oh, the dread. I hated that part of every writing workshop. My heart would pound so loudly I was sure I was shaking the table.

“I thought we could go around and hear what you’ve written,” he proposed. “But you don’t have to share.”

One by one, people read their poems–lively, vibrant stories, descriptions, and confessions. I felt just as I did back in college: impressed with the talent in the room, and very small by comparison; insecure, inadequate, unskilled, slow-witted, and shy.

And I did something so wimpy that I can’t believe I did it.

I passed.

Every single person in that room shared their writing, except me. When the person to my left finished, Manning turned to me and nodded.

I bit my lower lip in an effort to look sort of sheepish and pointed to the lady next to me.

Manning said, “Oh! You’re passing–okay. Well, that’s fine.” I appreciated his tone. He didn’t make me feel bad or make a big to-do. He just smiled reassuringly and nodded to the lady to my right.

“Oh!” she said, surprised. “You’re passing. Oh, okay.”

I stared at my page as she read her poem. I was embarrassed. You’d think after xx years, I’d be more confident and bold.

I guess not.

I’m looking at my page now. It’s just a tight, tiny little paragraph of confusion. A mess of words with nothing solid. No story to give it a form, no metaphor to strengthen it.

Perhaps I think too much. Or, perhaps I don’t think enough. I like to think I just need a little more time.

Whatever the case may be, I do believe I lost an opportunity. There I was in a group of writers who were digging deep and putting themselves out there, sharing spontaneous, gut-level reactions to the call to say something outrageous to God.

And I stayed silent. The pit of my stomach ruled me, inhibited me, rendered me speechless.

Manning’s workshop was wonderfully designed–the poems and poets he chose gave each writer in the room permission to be free and write boldly when he gave the assignment.

I’ve given you links to all the poems but one (I couldn’t find a link to the Dugan poem). And I’ll repeat his assignment here.

Perhaps you can avoid the intimidation and fear that I felt and write something with life and energy like the others in that workshop?

Here’s the assignment:

“What is the most outlandish thing you could say to God? Write a poem that includes the phrase ‘and another thing.’”

If you want to share, feel free to paste it into the comments.

But of course, you don’t have to share. You are, with me, always free to pass.

And I won’t sound surprised if you do. Not a bit.

WFMW: Write from the Heart

At the writers’ colloquium I attended last weekend, the one where Haven Kimmel brought the keynote message, I participated in a breakout session entitled “Writing from the Heart.”

The workshop leader, Brent Bill, led us through a couple of simple exercises designed to illustrate that while it’s easier to write from our heads than our hearts…writing from our hearts can make a deeper, more meaningful and lasting impact on readers (and ourselves).

As I went through one of the exercises, I concluded–not surprisingly–that I am very head-oriented. I like thinking, learning, sorting through ideas. In fact, some of the people who have commented on my posts have mentioned that some of the things I’ve talked about have really made them think. I like to write about the things I’m thinking about, and there seems to be no lack of ideas in my noggin.

The key is to tackle the more profound issues of the heart, as well. In fact, Brent said, a convergence of heart and mind is ideal.

If I explore through my writing an issue that I’m both thinking about and turning over in my heart, I will probably produce something with much more power to minister and communicate to others.

After posting about providing regular, meaningful content in order to feed the readers of my blog, I thought this nugget was worth sharing with fellow bloggers.

It may be riskier emotionally, but if we want to touch, connect, impact and/or minister to readers–even entertain them–we should look for the places where our mind and heart converge; where the thing that we’re thinking about is also something we’re dealing with at the heart level.

It might even change us as we write it.

Ironically, this post does not illustrate this well. This is a head post. Helpful, hopefully; informative, perhaps. But not really dealing with matters of the heart.

I do hope to write more posts in the future that are even more heart-level, while honoring my commitment to a vibrant mind and lifelong learning.

I see others do it well, admiring their ability to merge storytelling and heart-issues with literary allusions, while tapping into inexaustible lexicons via their vibrant, vigorous intellects.

To offer readers meaningful content, look for the convergence of mind and heart in your life. Throw in some story, and you have the recipe for nourishing, memorable, linkable, TrackBackable posts.

Visit Rocks In My Dryer for more great ideas.

To browse my previous odd assortment of Works For Me Wednesday posts are here.